PublishedDecember 5, 2012

USPTO Should Be Applauded for Notice on Patent Transparency

In a round of good news, the USPTO has published a notice that it will be holding a roundtable on January 11, 2013 to look into regulations to “require greater public transparency concerning the ownership of patent applications and patents.”  The deadline for requesting to participate in the roundtable is December 21, 2012, and the deadline for submitting written comments is January 25, 2013.  In a good article by Nate Raymond at Reuters, he explains the notice and goes over the implications it would have on some of the worst patent trolls.  Specifically, Intellectual Ventures and Acacia Research often use shell holding companies to hold patents, making it highly complicated to figure out who actually owns a patent.

This is a positive development and we hope the USPTO will create this needed transparency.  Transparency in patent ownership will allow companies to have a better understanding of exactly who is suing them, whom they would need a licensing fee from and the motivations of the party sitting across the table.  For companies doing searches to see if they are violating a patent, it will enable them to know whom they have to talk to if they find a troublesome patent.

It would also make it tougher for trolls to use complicated corporate structures to try and hide potential liabilities resulting from their actions.  Additionally, it would help U.S. competition authorities, including the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice, have a better understanding of the impact trolls are having on marketplace competition.  Basically, it would make the business of being a troll slightly tougher, and that is a good thing.

circle 09

Josh Lamel

Josh Landau

Patent Counsel, CCIA

Joshua Landau is the Patent Counsel at the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), where he represents and advises the association regarding patent issues.  Mr. Landau joined CCIA from WilmerHale in 2017, where he represented clients in patent litigation, counseling, and prosecution, including trials in both district courts and before the PTAB.

Prior to his time at WilmerHale, Mr. Landau was a Legal Fellow on Senator Al Franken’s Judiciary staff, focusing on privacy and technology issues.  Mr. Landau received his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and his B.S.E.E. from the University of Michigan.  Before law school, he spent several years as an automotive engineer, during which time he co-invented technology leading to U.S. Patent No. 6,934,140.

Follow @PatentJosh on Twitter.

More Posts

Much Ado About Injunctions: Redux

Patent policy debates have raged since 2006 when the Supreme Court decided eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388 (2006). Critics of eBay frequently cite the decision as having effectively en...

Tuesday Markup of Litigation Funding Legislation

Although John Squires is busy destroying the PTAB—as of last week, he has now gone 0 for 34 on allowing institution of IPR petitions he reviews—the story in Congress is more positive. Tomorrow, t...

Step 1: Destroy IPR.  Step 2: ???  Step 3: Profit.

Last week, the USPTO issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) containing major changes to the institution process for inter partes review.  Combined with other changes made by the USPTO, inc...

Subscribe to Patent Progress

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.