PublishedDecember 7, 2012

Previewing Monday’s DOJ/FTC Workshop on Patent Trolls and Antitrust

On Monday, Patent Progress will be out in full force at the joint public workshop on patent assertion entity (PAE) behavior organized by the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  They have put together an excellent series of panels, and we will be live-tweeting the workshop all day at our Twitter handle: @PatentProgress.  There is no hashtag yet for the event, so please follow us on Twitter to see our comments.

Patent Progress supports the FTC and DOJ in their efforts to shed light on the anti-competitive effects of patent trolls and privateers.  In addition to examining how trolls hold-up innovative companies by amassing significant patent portfolios, the FTC and DOJ should look further into “privateering,” the increasing practice of large companies working with trolls to attack their rivals.

As for the event itself, Colleen Chien will be giving the opening lecture.  She has done groundbreaking work looking at the effects of patent trolls on startups and the high-tech field generally, and it should be a compelling presentation.

The second presentation will be from Carl Shapiro, who authored an important paper on the patent thicket and the role antitrust solutions could play in solving it.  He is a leading thinker on the intersection of antitrust and patents, and will also provide a great perspective for the workshop.

After the keynotes, there will be three sessions, all of which have balanced panels that should provide differing perspectives on PAEs and antitrust law.  Specifically, the first session entitled, “Realities of Licensing and Litigation Practices,” should have some fireworks pitting representatives from notorious non-practicing entities Intellectual Ventures and Mosaid against representatives from Cisco and RPX.  Cisco CEO John Chambers has come out guns blazing against trolls, with Cisco making racketeering allegations against two trolls.  RPX has come up with an innovative solution to companies facing patent troll problems — self-help by helping corporations manage their exposure to patent litigation.

Session B will focus on the efficiencies and problems created by trolls.  Session C will focus on the role of antitrust and patent assertion entities.  Although he is not on the panel, Patent Progress’s David Balto will be preparing an interesting analysis on this topic which we will cross-post on Patent Progress on Monday.

It should certainly be an interesting and eventful day and we look forward to being a part of it.  As a reminder, the full schedule is available and the event will be live streamed.

circle 09

Josh Lamel

Josh Landau

Patent Counsel, CCIA

Joshua Landau is the Patent Counsel at the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), where he represents and advises the association regarding patent issues.  Mr. Landau joined CCIA from WilmerHale in 2017, where he represented clients in patent litigation, counseling, and prosecution, including trials in both district courts and before the PTAB.

Prior to his time at WilmerHale, Mr. Landau was a Legal Fellow on Senator Al Franken’s Judiciary staff, focusing on privacy and technology issues.  Mr. Landau received his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and his B.S.E.E. from the University of Michigan.  Before law school, he spent several years as an automotive engineer, during which time he co-invented technology leading to U.S. Patent No. 6,934,140.

Follow @PatentJosh on Twitter.

More Posts

Much Ado About Injunctions: Redux

Patent policy debates have raged since 2006 when the Supreme Court decided eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388 (2006). Critics of eBay frequently cite the decision as having effectively en...

Tuesday Markup of Litigation Funding Legislation

Although John Squires is busy destroying the PTAB—as of last week, he has now gone 0 for 34 on allowing institution of IPR petitions he reviews—the story in Congress is more positive. Tomorrow, t...

Step 1: Destroy IPR.  Step 2: ???  Step 3: Profit.

Last week, the USPTO issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) containing major changes to the institution process for inter partes review.  Combined with other changes made by the USPTO, inc...

Subscribe to Patent Progress

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.